Modern tech stacks are increasingly complex. More robust apps hit the market regularly and go-to SaaS solutions are always leveling-up. Choosing the right integration platform has never been more important.
Both Workato and Make are iPaaS platforms that help customers integrate and automate across business units, but a closer look at the capabilities of both reveals stark differences in capabilities. Here are five key reasons why Workato stands out as the superior iPaaS platform when compared to Make.
The difference between Workato and Make
- Ease of Use and Accessibility:
Us: In addition to supercharging engineering and dev teams, Workato’s user-friendly iPaaS interface is designed to be accessible to non-technical users, such as Customer Success Managers (CSMs), support staff, and implementation teams. This democratizes the integration process, allowing more team members to manage and maintain integrations without needing extensive technical knowledge.
Them: Make’s more complex interface limits its usability to a smaller group of users and increase the total cost of ownership (TCO) due to the need for specialized skills.
- Scalability and Flexibility:
Us: Workato offers extensive scalability and flexibility, supporting over 1,000 connectivity options including apps, databases, and files. This broad range of connectivity ensures that businesses can meet diverse and evolving integration needs.
Them: Make can’t offer the same level of connectivity and flexibility as Workato, which limits its ability to service larger enterprise customers and handle more complex integration scenarios. Their connectivity is primarily limited to cloud based apps.
- Capabilities:
Us: Workato’s iPaaS solution provides robust integration capabilities including streamlined and user friendly error handling, reusable callable scenarios, and easy to use bulk upload options.
Them: Make lacks winning functionality in these areas, their error handling is less robust and they don’t support callable scenarios. Plus they require item aggregation before bulk uploading, all of which can be significant drawbacks for businesses looking to offer seamless integration experiences.
- Data Security and Compliance:
Us: Security and Governance is our top priority. Workato offers data centers in multiple regions including the US, EU (Germany), and APAC (Singapore), with plans to expand further. This geographical diversity meets compliance and data security requirements globally, making it a reliable choice for multinational enterprises.
Them: Make has much more limited data center options, which could be a concern for organizations with stringent data residency and compliance needs. Or organizations that plan to expand internationally.
- Customer and Community Support:
Us: Workato is trusted by over 350 industry-leading customers and boasts a community of over 400,000 automations. It is highly rated by product managers and recognized as a leader by Gartner, Forrester, G2, and Trust Radius. Our extensive support network and broad community validation provide businesses with confidence in our reliability and effectiveness.
Them: Make does not have the same level of widespread adoption or community support. For businesses seeking a proven and well-supported iPaaS, Make comes up short.
Workato vs Make
If you’re looking for an iPaaS platform that is ideal for both developers and non-technical users alike, with broad scalability and flexibility, plus robust governance and customer/community support, the answer is clear. Workato is the hands down best choice. Want to learn more? Check out how Workato works, or better yet schedule a personalized demo today.
